<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techslaves.org &#187; ups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techslaves.org/tag/ups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techslaves.org</link>
	<description>Owned (and fascinated) by technology!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:36:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IBM Changed UPS Vendors</title>
		<link>http://techslaves.org/2010/03/30/ibm-change-ups-vendors/</link>
		<comments>http://techslaves.org/2010/03/30/ibm-change-ups-vendors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 02:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rthomson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sysadmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datacenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techslaves.org/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just recently, I discovered that IBM decided to quietly switch their UPS vendor from APC to Eaton (Powerware). We needed to replace a dead IBM UPS 3000 XHV (SmartUPS-3000) and so I ordered a new IBM UPS, the UPS 3000 HV (Eaton 5125). Upon receiving the UPS, I noticed that the battery and power module [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://techslaves.org/2010/03/30/check-your-ups-batteries/' rel='bookmark' title='Check Your UPS Batteries!'>Check Your UPS Batteries!</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just recently, I discovered that IBM decided to quietly switch their UPS vendor from APC to Eaton (Powerware). We needed to replace a dead IBM UPS 3000 XHV (SmartUPS-3000) and so I ordered a new IBM UPS, the UPS 3000 HV (Eaton 5125). Upon receiving the UPS, I noticed that the battery and power module were rather different. So I boot up the UPS and start configuring the web management card and it hits me&#8230; this isn&#8217;t an APC UPS, it&#8217;s an Eaton! ARG! Why?!? WHY?!? :&#8217;(</p>
<p><span id="more-37"></span></p>
<p>This won&#8217;t have a large functional difference but it pisses me off none-the-less. I&#8217;ve been using Network UPS Tools (NUT) with our APC UPS devices over USB and now I come to realize that this Eaton UPS doesn&#8217;t support USB, or rather it doesn&#8217;t come with a USB cable although the documentation says it does. Now to integrate this Eaton UPS with NUT I need to use SNMP since the Eaton only comes with a serial cable, which is useless to me for monitoring purposes. I guess I get to find out how NUT&#8217;s SNMP support is now.</p>
<p>This silent switch with a minor model change/update just rubs me the wrong way. I&#8217;m not so happy with the management of this UPS either&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: </strong>Got the Powerware 5125 working with NUT via SNMP&#8230; seems good so far.</p>
<p>For the sake of posterity, here is my /etc/ups/ups.conf for the 5125 to work with NUT:</p>
<pre>[ibm3000_1]
  driver = snmp-ups
  port = ibm3000-1.mydomain.com
  mibs = pw
  pollfreq = 30
  community = mycommunity
  snmp_version = v1
  desc = "Rack \#1 - IBM UPS 3000 HV @ U1/2"</pre>
<p>This of course assume you&#8217;ve already properly configured the 5125 with a DNS name or IP address and properly enabled SNMP, allowing your NUT client to connect</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE 2: </strong>The Powerware is starting to grow on me a little. It looks like it packs more juice than the same 2U unit from APC: 45% load and 12 minutes run time compared to an APC with 48% load and 8 minute run time. As long as I ignore the web management interface and stick to NUT via SNMP, I actually kind of like this UPS.</p>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://techslaves.org/2010/03/30/check-your-ups-batteries/' rel='bookmark' title='Check Your UPS Batteries!'>Check Your UPS Batteries!</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techslaves.org/2010/03/30/ibm-change-ups-vendors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check Your UPS Batteries!</title>
		<link>http://techslaves.org/2010/03/30/check-your-ups-batteries/</link>
		<comments>http://techslaves.org/2010/03/30/check-your-ups-batteries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 02:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rthomson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sysadmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techslaves.org/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every now and then it&#8217;s a good idea to check your UPS batteries, right? Sure, we all know that. But who really does it? In well run environments UPSes are monitored, internally and/or externally but in a small machine room with only a couple racks, the individual UPS systems may not be monitored. These machine [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://techslaves.org/2010/03/30/ibm-change-ups-vendors/' rel='bookmark' title='IBM Changed UPS Vendors'>IBM Changed UPS Vendors</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://techslaves.org/downloads/2010/03/ups-batteries.jpg"></a>Every now and then it&#8217;s a good idea to check your UPS batteries, right? Sure, we all know that. But who really does it? In well run environments UPSes are monitored, internally and/or externally but in a small machine room with only a couple racks, the individual UPS systems may not be monitored. These machine rooms (closets?) might also not be frequented by people very often or may not even get a visit, ever unless something goes wrong.</p>
<p><span id="more-35"></span>The reason you want to check your UPS often? Well, there are a few but here&#8217;s mine:</p>
<p><a href="http://techslaves.org/downloads/2010/03/ups-batteries.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-34" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 0px initial initial;" title="UPS Batteries" src="http://techslaves.org/downloads/2010/03/ups-batteries.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>I found that one day in the UPS supporting our firewall/passive gateway device. Notice the top two battery packs. The UPS wasn&#8217;t monitored and was still happily putting power through but I really wonder what would have happened had we experienced a power loss and the battery was actually called upon&#8230; would it just have lasted much shorter than it was supposed to or was there a real fire/safety hazard here? I don&#8217;t know for certain, but I know when your batteries start bulging and being misshapen, it&#8217;s time to replace them.</p>
<p>The scratching on the battery pack labels is a result of trying to remove the battery pack tray from the UPS shell and having it just barely fit by the edge. Any more bulging and the tray wasn&#8217;t going to come out, complicating the fix as I swapped this battery tray for another, all online. If I wasn&#8217;t able to remove the battery pack, I would have had to shutdown the firewall device as it only has one PSU, I couldn&#8217;t &#8220;move&#8221; it to another UPS online.</p>
<p>So yes, please be sure to check your UPS system and battery packs, especially if they are 3+ years old like this one was!</p>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://techslaves.org/2010/03/30/ibm-change-ups-vendors/' rel='bookmark' title='IBM Changed UPS Vendors'>IBM Changed UPS Vendors</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techslaves.org/2010/03/30/check-your-ups-batteries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

