<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techslaves.org &#187; neural emesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techslaves.org/tag/neural-emesis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techslaves.org</link>
	<description>Owned (and fascinated) by technology!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>(De)Centralized</title>
		<link>http://techslaves.org/2011/10/07/de-centralizing/</link>
		<comments>http://techslaves.org/2011/10/07/de-centralizing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 23:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rthomson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sysadmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datacenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neural emesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techslaves.org/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The primary motivation for the decentralized model is to give the individual departments better or more customized service through having a stronger relationship with the SAs and more control over the work that they do. The primary motivation for centralizing system administration is to control costs through tracking costs centrally and then reducing them by [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<em>The primary motivation for the decentralized model is to give the individual departments better or more customized service through having a stronger relationship with the SAs and more control over the work that they do. The primary motivation for centralizing system administration is to control costs through tracking costs centrally and then reducing them by eliminating redundancy and taking advantage of economies of scale</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Practice of System and Network Administration</span>, Thomas A. Limoncelli and Christine Hogan.</p>
<p>Bingo. But can there be a third hybrid model?</p>
<p>I currently represent the decentralized model and I must agree with these two fine authors that the benefit of my close working relationship with the individual department/group is that the service provided is highly customized and focused. The central IT department(s) are understandably focused on large-scale issues (&#8220;Infrastructure&#8221;, &#8220;Communications&#8221;, &#8220;Collaboration&#8221;, &#8220;Applications&#8221;) and as such do not always represent the most ideal channel for delivery of IT services to the various research groups and departments on campus, often with more nuanced, specialized and micro-level issues.</p>
<p>One of my developing long-term goals is to (warning: business jargon) &#8220;bridge the gap&#8221; between the focused local support that I currently represent and the value proposition(s) of centralized IT services. I&#8217;m not yet entirely certain of how to accomplish this but I am certain that there is a way to improve the delivery of IT services to researchers across all our campuses and I want to be involved.</p>
<p>Does such an approach warrant the definition of a third hybrid model or is this so-called bridging of the gap already encapsulated in the model of centralized vs. decentralized?</p>
<p>Some of the challenges I face specifically as a &#8220;standalone&#8221; decentralized sysadmin on campus are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Dealing with <em>all</em> IT needs from desktop support to infrastructure development to data security</li>
<li>Developing and maintaining vendor contacts and relationships</li>
<li>No immediate peers in our environment to bounce specific ideas around with</li>
<li>Weak purchasing power and negotiation leverage</li>
<li>Duplication of effort</li>
<li>Career progression is potentially limited</li>
<li>All too easy to develop a &#8220;King of the Castle&#8221; attitude</li>
<li>Complacency</li>
</ul>
<p>Some of the concerns I hear about when introducing researchers to the idea of centralized IT support:</p>
<ul>
<li>General lack of trust/faith in the centralized IT department</li>
<li>Perceived lack of personal attention and focus (turn around times, site knowledge, etc.)</li>
<li>Perceived lack of &#8220;control&#8221; over their environment (and data!) under the centralized model</li>
<li>Charge-back models for IT services are viewed as grant-unfriendly</li>
<li>Physical hardware ownership appears to remain important for many researchers</li>
</ul>
<p>Of course, this is but a snapshot of the challenges I face and the concerns I&#8217;ve been hearing but they do serve as decent examples. It must also be noted that I am seeing great progress is many of these areas already because there are very bright people here already working on these challenges. My interest in this field is absolutely not unique.</p>
<p>For the immediate future, I&#8217;m focusing on improving my collaborations and communication with centralized IT services by helping them out where I can and leaning on them more often for our localized problems. My hope is that by constantly forging a closer working relationship will increasingly expose me (and in turn, our group) to the benefits of the centralized IT model while providing the central IT group with greater insight into our environment and how we work.</p>
<p>The next steps are still a mystery to me but I&#8217;m keeping my eyes open for new opportunities to bring better IT to research.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techslaves.org/2011/10/07/de-centralizing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Books24x7: Not Impressed</title>
		<link>http://techslaves.org/2010/05/21/books24x7-not-impressed/</link>
		<comments>http://techslaves.org/2010/05/21/books24x7-not-impressed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rthomson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neural emesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techslaves.org/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s right, you read it correctly: I&#8217;m not impressed with Books24x7. It&#8217;s not their collection (plenty of stuff for various fields of interest) and it&#8217;s not their price (I&#8217;m using it under a campus subscription so what&#8217;s to complain about?). It&#8217;s their interface. Could it be anymore annoying to read a book than the Books24x7 [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, you read it correctly: I&#8217;m not impressed with Books24x7.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not their collection (plenty of stuff for various fields of interest) and it&#8217;s not their price (I&#8217;m using it under a campus subscription so what&#8217;s to complain about?). It&#8217;s their interface.</p>
<p>Could it be anymore annoying to read a book than the Books24x7 experience? Was this website designed in the 90s?</p>
<p>What frustrates me the most is that you cannot usefully navigate/read a book on Books24x7 without the use of a mouse. Sure, I can use Spacebar, the arrow keys or Page Up/Page Down to navigate on a single page, but because each &#8220;page&#8221; is just a small chunk of text, you need to constantly be clicking the &#8220;Next&#8221; link. Tab key link navigation, you say? There are so many links at the top of the page that tabbing through all of them to reach the &#8220;Next&#8221; link takes longer than grabbing for the mouse.</p>
<p>This is just a terrible book reading experience. Perhaps I&#8217;ve just been spoiled by&#8230; I dunno? PDF files and Preview.app or Stanza? I want to read some of these books but Books24x7 just makes it so unpleasant that I&#8217;d rather just find the hardcopies at the library or pay for a decent ebook version that I can read on whatever device or with whatever software that might actually be designed with some thought regarding the reading experience.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techslaves.org/2010/05/21/books24x7-not-impressed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New and Improved techslaves.org&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://techslaves.org/2010/03/29/the-new-and-improved-techslaves-org/</link>
		<comments>http://techslaves.org/2010/03/29/the-new-and-improved-techslaves-org/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rthomson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neural emesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.techslaves.org/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here it is: The new and improved techslaves.org. Well, I don&#8217;t actually know if it&#8217;s improved but sure is new. In a rash decision, I&#8217;ve decided to drop any fantasy of supporting a community of tech-minded people through techslaves.org. The site was previous an SMF forum with a nice mod called TinyPortal that I used [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://techslaves.org/2010/10/31/a-tiny-milestone-for-techslaves-org/' rel='bookmark' title='A Tiny Milestone For techslaves.org!'>A Tiny Milestone For techslaves.org!</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here it is: The new and improved techslaves.org. Well, I don&#8217;t actually know if it&#8217;s improved but sure is new. In a rash decision, I&#8217;ve decided to drop any fantasy of supporting a community of tech-minded people through techslaves.org. The site was previous an SMF forum with a nice mod called TinyPortal that I used to publish articles and coax friends and acquaintances into submitting their own content for publishing.</p>
<p>Community building is hard and I&#8217;m lazy. What more can I say?</p>
<p><span id="more-12"></span></p>
<p>Techslaves is now powered by WordPress because it&#8217;s just so much better for doing what I want to be doing with the site from now on (which is dumping my brain contents onto the web) than SMF + TinyPortal. At this point, I&#8217;m trying to port some content over from the previous version of the site. I don&#8217;t expect to port <em>all</em> the content over, especially content contributed by other people. Also, from regularly checking my logs, I noticed that I would receive a decent amount of traffic for posts I won&#8217;t be bringing over. It&#8217;s time to move on anyways&#8230;</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the end-game of dropping the bot-magnet community forum model and converting to WordPress? I&#8217;m hoping that the much better tools for writing and managing the content, plus the simplified presentation will coerce me into writing down some of my thoughts a bit more often. I&#8217;m hoping to present those thoughts more clearly and with less distraction from download pages, galleries, forums, etc. No high hopes, just a change of scenery to shake things up a bit.</p>
<p>Enjoy and feel free to leave comments.</p>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://techslaves.org/2010/10/31/a-tiny-milestone-for-techslaves-org/' rel='bookmark' title='A Tiny Milestone For techslaves.org!'>A Tiny Milestone For techslaves.org!</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techslaves.org/2010/03/29/the-new-and-improved-techslaves-org/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

